By Lee Sang-hyuk
Junior, Dept. of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering
tkdgurbeeee@naver.com
Korea is in the top 5 for high passion for studying. It can easily be found that many parents want to let their children learn something faster than other students, so they rely on private education. It means that young children have to accept difficulties despite their age. In this way, private education increasingly takes the lead because of the excessive greed of students’ parents. This results in children relying on academies not schools. To control this phenomenon, the prohibition of fast learning has recently appeared. I think there are proper study levels at each age. Instead of only focusing on studying faster, it is necessary to remember the natural learning process at the same time. Therefore I hope the law will be enforced in the future.Junior, Dept. of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering
tkdgurbeeee@naver.com
By Shin Ji-won
Junior, Pusan National University
aadidasa@naver.com
By Sung Woo-hyun
Junior, Dongguk University
swh6886@naver.com
It is better to restrict studying ahead. I agree that there is no certain distinction in learning. However if you are disturbed by the rule of not studying ahead, we can study normal subjects further and deeper. That will be helpful in preparing for the next course. Beyond the individual level, it will lead to a better education system, streamlining teaching and learning methods in public schools. There will be decreased competition in grades among students. Human beings are desperate to achieve their goals. There are no visible goals to judge individuals’ general learning. It is like licking candy but not noticing its flavor. If there is a certain goal that everyone should achieve, the systematically prohibiting learning ahead will make students cooperate and study together with less burden.Junior, Dongguk University
swh6886@naver.com
By Kwon Su-ock
Junior, Dept. of English Language and Literature
justayear@naver.com